this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
23 points (96.0% liked)

UK Politics

5342 readers
127 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hmm that's kinda the price of democracy though. It's a lot of money for sure I'm not denying that. But we can't have a system of democracy whereby we ignore the rules (I know I know how stupid that sounds given the UK, but we can try and be better ๐Ÿ˜‚).

As a counterpoint, we held EU parliament elections in the UK in 2019 when we were leaving the EU. We could make the same argument there. But we did it to follow the rules that underpin good democratic governance (I know I know Brexit bad, grr shakes fist).

[โ€“] 20dogs@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We did it because the EU made us.

[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They made us on a whim? Or because it was the law? Now apply that thinking here.

[โ€“] 20dogs@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Difference here being we make the UK's law.

[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. And it is the law to conduct the elections. It wasn't the law to "conduct regular elections unless you can't be bothered in which case YOLO". That's why the courts ruled against the government.

Are you suggesting that if the government doesn't find the law convenient it should just ignore it?

[โ€“] 20dogs@feddit.uk 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

No I'm saying that the British government could pass primary legislation if it really wanted to and cancel the elections. Parliament is sovereign, but they just cancelled these elections in a really cack-handed way that forced them to backtrack (although they could in theory still take this route).

They didn't really have that choice for the EU elections.

[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 6 hours ago

Agreed. But they didn't. It's absolutely the cack handed way they've gone about this which is troubling. Yup ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿผ.