this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
249 points (98.1% liked)

Comic Strips

22165 readers
1457 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] iusearchbtw@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

clearly, especially since it's rhetorically convenient for you

an animal with a nervous system entirely analogous to ours and a plant that has crackly bubbles in its cells when it's low on water or damaged? the same thing, actually. identical. there is no difference between things, and if you think there are then clearly you're just a hypocritical vegan

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I mean not necessarily hypocritical or even wrong. Just possibly irreflexive or vain.

[–] iusearchbtw@feddit.uk -1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

don't you think that's a funny thing to say when you're building your entire metaphysical conception of the world around not having to change or question your lifestyle

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago

Coming from you, extremely.

[–] turdas@suppo.fi 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you mean by "crackly bubbles". Many plants (possibly most of them) use electrochemical signaling, which at the very least resembles the hormonal system in animals. The simplest animals are definitely less complex, neural processing wise, than the most complex plants -- consider for example sponges (literally no nervous system of any kind) vs. the venus flytrap (capable of rudimentary counting; the trap only closes when the hairs are triggered a certain number of times within a certain timeframe).

There's also tons of animals whose nervous systems aren't at all similar to that of humans. Insects and arthropods for example don't really have a brain, just lumps of ganglia that do some rudimentary processing, and unsurprisingly most people don't really consider insects to be capable of having any kind of meaningful sentient internal experience.

[–] iusearchbtw@feddit.uk 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

the article they posted to back up plants "feeling pain" anthropomorphises bubbles popping in the fibres of damaged plants as "crying", which is apparently proof for plant sentience

[–] Pudutr0n@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Not proof, just interesting to think about.