Memes of Production

1463 readers

1192 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

Deceptichum@quokk.au

439

trans women of colour distributing bricks is a basis for a system of government (quokk.au)

submitted 1 month ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/mop@quokk.au

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Pushing the old Nazi line of repeating an idiotic lie in the hopes that it will be believed. Have you considered a job in the current fascist administration? I'm sure they'd love to have you.

first off, my claim wasn’t “section 6(b) applies to gov’t officials.” i said biden has given permission for officials to refuse. you read “the act itself” as my only source, but i never said that was the sole source. you filled in the blank, then called me a fascist for it. solid work.

"Biden has given permission for government officials to refuse."

"I'm sure you have a source."

"Section 6(b) of the Respect of Marriage Act."

"That says nothing of the sort, and you literally had to chop off the quote mid-sentence to avoid stating as much."

"HA! You thought THAT was my SOURCE?"

Here, I'll say it again - this is the moronic dribble of a dyed-in-the-wool fascist who cares about nothing except totalitarian cacophony.

cute. ask kim davis how that ironclad precedent worked out. she straight-up refused, kept her job, and became a folk hero. so no, it wasn’t some pristine rule you’re pretending it was.

What years was Kim Davis in office, and what was the result of the hubub? Remind me.

Additionally, just for kicks, what years was Biden in office?

third, you breeze right past the part where i was right about the act expanding religious refusal rights for nonprofits,

That was never a point you made or a point in dispute. Since your memory and reading comprehension, typical of fascists, is so meagre, let me remind you of the totality of your claims before that point:

and pointlessly so, biden has given anyone permission for any gov’t official to refusal to certify or recognize a marriage by simply saying that it’s against their religion.

and it will be reversed without more bricks.

please identify where the misinformation is

[incorrect citation of the Respect of Marriage Act]

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

you keep demanding a fucking statute that says “gov’t officials may refuse,” then act like you won when you don’t see it. that’s not how this works.

kim davis literally refused, stayed in office, and precedent did jack shit to stop her. the act didn’t close that loophole. it actually affirmed anti-marriage beliefs as “reasonable” and “due respect.” you think officials won’t notice that?

you also keep pretending section 6(b) is irrelevant because it says “nonprofits.” cute. but the point isn’t that it covers officials directly—it’s that the law carves out explicit refusal rights for one group based on “sincere belief,” and there’s nothing in the text stopping courts from extending that logic to the next one. that’s not misinformation. that’s a prediction. and you still haven’t shown it’s false.

calling someone a fascist because they quoted a law correctly and drew a conclusion you don’t like isn’t an argument. it’s a tantrum and your unhinged response is proof of it. you’re so busy screaming “bullshit” that you never actually proved it’s bullshit.

so no, i wasn’t wrong and you’re still pretending the fire isn’t real because the match hasn’t been entered into evidence.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Here, I’ll say it again - this is the moronic dribble of a dyed-in-the-wool fascist who cares about nothing except totalitarian cacophony.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

tantrums don't help anything.