this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
93 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39299 readers
339 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

which means that they will not give progressives control of the party.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (8 children)

Also agree. If progressives are to have a party, centrists must be replaced with progressives.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

so why advocate voting for progressive democrats when moderate democrats will not allow any progressive members to control the democrat party?

you're just going to end up w a bernie, aoc, omar, etc. situation where they're not given enough control to change anything the democratic party's priorities; but trotted out like show ponys to convince progressives to vote for the democrats anyways.

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

People like Bernie and AOC are not progressive. They're nothing more than sheep dogs for the party to keep people locked in the party with false promises of eventually having a seat at the table. Going back to 1984 Democrats have always had a sheepdog to keep voters herded up like sheep.

People need to get out of the mindset of reform. We plainly seen that reform over the last hundred years does not work. Eugene Debs talked about Democrats trying to reform their party 100 years ago. WEB DuBois talked about Democrats trying to reform their party 60 years ago. They believe that if they change enough cogs within the machine, the machine will operate differently. It's time to scrap the machine

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

thoroughly agreed and that's what i'm getting at; voting for "progressive" democrats won't get us anywhere.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)