this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
0 points (50.0% liked)
cryptocurrency
3169 readers
1 users here now
The largest cryptocurrency community on the Fediverse!
Lemmy community dedicated to cryptocurrency news, technicals, education, memes and so more!
💬 Chat on Community Improvements and Development
Community Knowledge Base:
Be nice, have fun.
Community rules:
- No Spam
- No ads
- No aggressive coin promotion or attacks on others
- No ICOs / IEOs / STOs / token (pre)sales / scam schemes promotion
- No trading/buying crypto discussions
- No promotion of trading groups, courses, signal groups, or other trade groups
- No pumping and shilling
- No casinos, giveaways, faucets, begging
- No price speculation posts
- No trolling
General lemmy.ml instance rules applicable here too.
Ugly brother of this community: bωockchain
For a community devoted to cryptography itself, visit c/cryptography
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I fundamentally disagree with the author's worldview, however this is a good write-up.
One thing he didn't discuss was the block size debate and emergence of BCH. I recently heard a fellow cryptoskeptic explain that BCH was the side that people should have backed. Makes me wonder which side Epstein was on
What is the author's worldview?
Epstein funded the BTC side, small blockers. Their goal was to make sure Bitcoin cannot be used as a currency, which would threaten government backed bank issues notes.
BitcoinCash (BCH) is the real Bitcoin paper according to the original white paper.
The author seems to be a true believer in the mission of cryptocurrency (it's all bollocks, possibly created by the CIA)
Thanks for the details about Epstein! Quite fascinating