this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
88 points (81.0% liked)
Technology
81026 readers
5053 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Older Soviet tanks play turret toss, you know why? Their automatic loading system is optimized for fire rates, but not safety. You know why that and what that achieves? That achieves a whole lot of tanks built during Soviet times for mass ground warfare in the WWIII as it was imagined then. When it's one safer NATO tank against 5 worse but comparable (and fast-firing) Soviet tanks for the same expense, the choice (with Soviet doctrine) is obvious.
There was no brain drain then, these were all conscious design decisions making a difference of the scale of hundreds of tanks built.
Unfortunately no.
You are a few years late even in talking about tanks.
That's also something most Russians have passively understood by now about modern warfare, it's all about information, planning, coordination done by many small drones, with humans reduced to techs and operators and, of course, small assault groups. Tanks have no place in that.
Brain drain is something that was happening when plenty of Soviet-educated engineers and scientists simply had no place in ex-Soviet countries, or by any measure the offers they could get were far better in the West. Right now there's no coordinated incentive for said brain drain from the western governments. Which was a thing then.
Right now - yes, I think oil money that buys western components for weapons can buy expertise in areas of interest.
The autoloader can fire every 10 seconds. An Abrams crew can fire.. Every 4. NATO tanks are faster.
More Russian tanks also only matter if they ARE comparable. But they're not. For example, the "new engine" is an old Nazi design that was, and is still, famous for breaking down. They use thermal sights! Left over from the French.
Russians die AND they're slower. All glory to the motherland.
You should look up what brain drain means.
Fortunately for them yes? At least they're not dying in ukraine with sunflower seeds in their pockets.
Right!! That's why the invasion of ukraine was so quick! Plan for three days, the planning and coordination they passively understand means it's... Still going. 4 years later.
It's a darn good thing, too, since Russia has only built what, 30 T14s since 2015? Can't rely on something you can't build!
And you're right. Tanks have no place in modern warfare. That's why Russia saber rattles so hard when western nations give or sell tanks to Ukraine, because they're just so useless.
True!! If only they would stop putting that foreigner expertise straight onto the front lines. What a waste.