this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2026
69 points (93.7% liked)
People Twitter
9497 readers
541 users here now
People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.
RULES:
- Mark NSFW content.
- No doxxing people.
- Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
- No bullying or international politcs
- Be excellent to each other.
- Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Remember when he said BB-8 wasn't possible even though it was an actual remote controlled droid rolling around actual sand?
It wasn't though.
https://scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/113600/how-does-bb-8-move-in-the-sand-without-skidding
There were multiple different versions of the BB8 prop, and the ones where it is moving quickly, well, it's moving over a thin layer of sand on top of something more solid, and he's got a rig attached to him, that was green screened out.
Neil was basically right, something like BB8 would have terrible traction over sand dunes.
... and it did:
( EDIT: i hate sand, its coarse, irritating... )
The other versions were puppets, with green screened out pupeteers and control arms.
Fast moving BB8 on sand shot, done with puppet, pupeteer, and car camera:
You fell for a marketing campaign.
They absolutely did not build a real world BB8 capable of independently/remote control doing everything it does in the movies.
this is slander
Well they certainly made RC toys that work the way it looks in the film after the fact. And all I remember him saying was impossible was how BB-8's "head" kinda floats on top of the sphere.