Mildly Interesting

25014 readers

637 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world

Jimbabwe@lemmy.ml

WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world

Zerlyna@lemmy.world

142

How the audiences of news sources differ in their levels of education (www.pewresearch.org)

submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Ondore@lemmy.world to c/mildlyinteresting@lemmy.world

49 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Source: Pew Research Center

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

is on a scale of all US adults with college degrees

no, "Among US adults who regularly get news from ____, % who hav ea bachelor's degree or more," not all US adults with a degree, just all adults

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

OK you're right. the scales are:

on a scale of all US adults, the percentage who have a college degree
on a scale of all readers who primarily get their news from (given magazine), the percentage who have a college degree

So the scales are still different.

I'm guessing they'd make an argument that: "If the college graduate readership were distributed evenly across all news sources, then (given magazine) would have (the percentage of all US adults who have a college degree)." But the labels don't say that, which is why it is confusing.