this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
63 points (100.0% liked)

Open Source

44250 readers
216 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Here and there are posts about tailwind losing its revenue stream. And then people / post authors conclude open source is lost and spread FUD.

Do you think your projects die because of LLMs?

I only have public hobby projects, I am not afraid. I also try to donate to a lot of free software that I use or like.

E.g. this https://programming.dev/post/43810907 or https://programming.dev/post/45292081

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Github has gone downhill.

CodeBerg is really nice, has a free tier, and has guided tutorials for migration.

I moved my work out of spite for GitHub's warmongering parent company.

And then I was pleasantly surprised by how nice CodeBerg is.

[–] ageedizzle@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

CodeBerg sounds great but this doesn’t seem like a longterm solution. If CodeBerg ends up getting really big then it will get overrun with slop as well. We need to find a way to cut the slop problem off at its source, but I have no idea how that could actually work.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago

We need to find a way to cut the slop problem off at its source, but I have no idea how that could actually work. 

Agreed. Stopping giving money to Microsoft seems like a place to start.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Plus, probably filters out low value contributions. People on Codeberg are generally genuinely interested in a project and not chasing activity graphs/clout/CV padding.