this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2026
764 points (98.7% liked)

Political Memes

10942 readers
2690 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Nuclear fission is not renewable. It relies on mined uranium, which is rather limited.

The uranium is gonna continue to undergo fission, whether we mine it or not, whether we enrich/refine it or not. At that point it's like collecting energy from our surroundings, really functionally no different than harvesting geothermal, wind, solar, hydro, etc.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

Exactly, nuclear is no less renewable than solar. Where does everyone think the solar energy comes from? Nuclear.

We might as well capture the uranium decay, as you said, it will release the energy whether we collect it or not.

[–] Dalvoron@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's such a disingenuous presentation of the facts. Of course there is no such thing as truly renewable energy, but there is a difference in kind between a supply of energy that is practically inexhaustible on the timescale of human civilisation (what people mean when they say renewable) and energy produced from a limited fuel supply on earth (non renewable).

Solar (and its byproduct energies wind, hydro, biomass), tidal, geothermal are not in the same category as fission of rare heavy metals.

I say all this as someone pro-nuclear who agrees that we should use it while it is still fissionable.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

We are talking about dozens of millennia of uranium supply on Earth. Other fuel types and nuclear technologies look to extend that into billions of years. For all functional purposes, it's infinite. Just as solar energy is functionally infinite.

a supply of energy that is practically inexhaustible on the timescale of human civilisation (what people mean when they say renewable)

As I said: Nuclear is Renewable, in the exact same way everyone uses the term.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Fusion and fission are two different processes.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

I think the point he's trying to make is that the sun technically has a finite lifetime, albeit in that case one that's long enough to be functionally irrelevant from the perspective of human time scales.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Radioactive decay is not the same as fission. It's not entirely unrelated, but definitely a different process.

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Different rates of decay vs the natural state.