106
GOG did an AMA and here's some highlights - like how they'll continue using generative AI
(www.gamingonlinux.com)
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
I'm about as anti-AI as you can get, but that wasn't a confirmation - it was a non-answer.
And considering how many things "AI" is getting crammed into, if they'd given a definitive answer, it wouldn't have been possible to guarantee it - because they're not in control of every business scenario in the industry.
I am genuinely curious why people are so angry and are jumping to conclusions, willing to boycott a company that has done great things for media preservation over an inconvlusive statement about something that will likely have minimal or no effect on them, GOGs employees, or the user experience of their platform.
AI assistance is a tool. Why would they ban their developers and maintainers from using Windsurf, for instance? Or their design folks from using AI tools to help make mockups? It doesn't make any sense. If their workforce wants to make use of AI tools responsibly... why is that a problem?
AI use does not mean they will start churning out slop. And, frankly, GOG is a software distributor/vendor... they don't have creative control over the games they sell. The AI would be in the behind the scenes development of their platform, not in the products. The only way it'd affect users is if they put it in the user interface somehow (but... how and why would they?)
Because it will lead to buggy and insecure service, causing customer headaches. Imagine asking a random number generator to write your payment infrastructure!
Or your toaster what its prefered income bracket is.