this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
226 points (99.6% liked)

People Mastodon

300 readers
644 users here now

People tooting stuff. We allow toots from anyone and are platform agnostic (Mastodon, BlueSky, Twitter, Tumblr, FaceBook, Whatever)

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] officermike@lemmy.world 15 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Your point? Not to detract from her awfulness, but neither of these documents implicate JK Rowling in pedophilia.

[–] rljkeimig@lemmy.world 17 points 16 hours ago

At a minimum, pedo apologist.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

Why else would anyone interact with that man, if not to support or partake of his evil deeds?

I mean, my name sure as fuck isn’t in there.

[–] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 21 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Because he was an (likely intelligence-affiliated) influence broker with a huge social circle. Doesn't make associating with him less scummy, but it does not mean someone was necessarily a pedophile. Though, statistically speaking, it does dramatically increase that probability.

[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago

A: “can you introduce me to JK Rowling? Also remember Julie?”

Epstein: “sure I remember Julie”

(͡•_ ͡• )

Where does it say Epstein is friends with JK?