this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026
2 points (100.0% liked)
AskHistorians
1240 readers
25 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Legalism in China was the philosophy that if laws regulate every aspect of life and are strictly enforced for everyone equally, including local rulers, the state will function and justice will prevail, even if the local rulers are corrupt or incompetent.
This lead to harsh punishments for breaking the letter of the law, regardless of intent or circumstances, even if what the law demanded was impossible to do.
So a ruler could be sentenced to death for a failure that was outside of his control, and have no other alternative than to rebel against the emperor, even if he was actually loyal to him.
There's that law if you injure somebody there you have to help support them for life, and then the result was the videos of people hitting a pedestrian and then driving back over them a few times to ensure they died. Fine/jail for killing was less than lifelong payments to support the victim.