this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
37 points (100.0% liked)
askchapo
23219 readers
187 users here now
Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.
Rules:
-
Posts must ask a question.
-
If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.
-
Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.
-
Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I like this question a lot. I think I'd agree to an extent that absolutism was a response to the rising capitalist class yeah. In essence they gave in to the burghers economic demands, (pushing towarda capitalist economic relations in England in the 1200s and 1300s, in France in the 1500s and 1600s) but refused to hand over the highest reigns of power. Absolutism is the result of their maintaining the formal political structure of feudalism over top the structures of capitalism, growing more absolutist the greater the burghers power grows.
My view is that what most people typically think of when they hear "feudalism" and "medieval society" is this proto-absolutist states 1300s-1500s western Europe. So their conception of feudalism is is already feudalism in decay, its economic, social and even political structures rapidly being hollowed out by the emerging bourgeois in the cities.