this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
-11 points (17.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

40155 readers
1448 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was listening to this series on audio book in the shower when this occurred to me. 'Gadara' is a fantasy species of wolfpeople's word for enemies that are respected and even trusted. A worthy foe sort of thing.

The idea is that the predatory wolf people believe friends can betray you, but an enemy can be trusted to act in their own self interest if they show themselves to be an honorable sort. Each party to the relationship maintains their status as enemies and expects the other to kill them if given the opportunity, but also can work together against threats to both. Being a gadara to someone also confers a bit of protection with your gadara's allies. A gadara can vouch for each other, and have laid claim to the honor of killing the other. So vouching for a gadara is saying "I want to be the one to kill this one, please respect that and leave them to me."

So to bring this around, an understanding between individual tankies and anarchists where both parties understand their ideals are incompatible, but the other can be trusted to work against fash would be a pretty useful arrangement. If we don't look past each other to the greater threat of fascism we won't be around long enough to get to have our fight in the end.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean like vegans teaming up with butchers to fight against the meat-industry?

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean yeah that kinda works as a metaphor. Imagine if vegans and butchers teamed up to destroy Tyson foods before going back to being enemies

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That does not make sense. Vegans teaming up with vegetarians may make a bit more sense, but even in this is not plausible because vegetarians are ok with killing animals, they are just not ok with eating them.

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

The key is finding the axis along which your interests align, and finding an individual enemy whose motivations are enough to trust. If you find for instance a halal butcher who the corporate player is trying to crush, you might find yourself someone with means and motivation to help you improve the world somewhat before your division reasserts itself. It isn't so much 'let's compromise' as it is 'we might never get along, but destroying the meat corporation is a matter of survival for both of us'

[–] stepan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

vegetarians are ok with killing animals, they are just not ok with eating them.

what?

vegetarianism simply means not eating meat. i don't understand where did you get that all people who don't eat meat have the same motivation (whatever that's supposed to be) and why do you present it like a fact.

i'm a vegetarian because i'm not ok with killing animals.

[–] 5ibelius9insterberg@feddit.org 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This could be a language problem. In my mother tongue a vegetarian still consumes dairy products and eggs and maybe wears leather. And If you drink milk, eat cheese/yoghurt/butter, your ok with killing animals. A cow needs a calf to give milk, and the calves are being slaughtered because a dairy farm has not the space to keep them around.

[–] stepan@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago

There's like a million reasons some people can't affort to go full vegan, and shittalking people who at least do something is not a good idea when the majority doesn't care. It's like saying people who use public transport are ok with global warming because they could just walk or ride a bike.