this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2026
1024 points (94.1% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

15415 readers
438 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 0 points 2 days ago (13 children)

How's there nothing wrong with paying rent? Why is someone else appropriating the fruits of MY labor just because they happen to be lucky enough to inherit a house?

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

sorry, what about your labor makes it more valuable than anyone else who also rents?

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Nothing. Abolish all private rent and socialize it

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then the government will need to purchase the houses / apartments from the current owners so they still get a giant payday.

Then you'd still be paying rent, just to the government instead which will mostly go towards paying administrators that don't care or do anything just like current landlords.

Unless you mean all social government owned housing should be free, and most private property should be government owned.

[–] Riverside@reddthat.com 2 points 2 days ago

Then the government will need to purchase the houses / apartments from the current owners

Expropriation can be carried out without purchase, and it has been done in several countries to the great benefit of the workers. No need to pay for the housing of the landlords, we can just take it at gunpoint.

Then you’d still be paying rent, just to the government instead which will mostly go towards paying administrators that don’t care or do anything just like current landlords

Who says the housing has to be centrally administered? Housing could absolutely be organized by local collectives in charge of the maintenance of the buildings after its construction, likely in the form of democratically elected councils. As an example, most access to housing in the USSR was through the work's union, not through the central government.

Unless you mean all social government owned housing should be free

No, people should pay costs to maintain it. For example, rent in the USSR was about 3% of the monthly income. Seems much better than what I pay now!

load more comments (9 replies)