this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
254 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

80479 readers
4373 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 33 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Not sure what the manufacturers were thinking, this chart has existed for a long time, you have to be sitting pretty close or looking at a rather large screen for 8K to make sense

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 8 points 15 hours ago

What it feels like to look at a TV that's close enough to justify 8K:

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Where would 1440p lie on this?

[–] olympicyes@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

1440p screens are all monitors you sit 2-4’ from. That close you can justify a higher resolution but people pick 1440p for other reasons like frame rate.

[–] Hazzard@lemmy.zip 13 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (2 children)

Yeah, most people aren't within 6 feet of their TV, and most people aren't buying 100" TVs either. 8K is relevant for virtually nobody.

A lot of companies are successfully working on larger panels (I saw something about a 165" TV recently), so 8K may have a good place in a theatre room one day, but that still leaves you a lot of problems to solve first, and is far from mainstream until all of that becomes a lot cheaper.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 8 points 20 hours ago

We bought a 60" LG LCD first. It was too big for our living room, so when the backlight went faulty and we were offered a refund we chopped it in for the 55" OLED, which is basically perfect for our room.

Turns out 5" really can make a difference.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I am sitting within 6 feet of mine, well lying in bed really. The 50 inches of my TV are huge from that distance and it's still well within the 1080p zone of that graphic. And this 4k TV was already pretty cheap when I bought it almost a decade ago. I gave up watching 4k content years ago when I could not tell the difference to high quality 1080p content.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

and then you have people like me who use 50inch TVs as computer monitors that sit on their desk.