this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
20 points (100.0% liked)
news
497 readers
752 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That should then nuke SpaceX's objective-value:
WHY would they keep AI from writing code used in their spaceships, if they're 1/2-AI & 1/2-SpaceX??
So long as they were separate companies, then it made sense to presume that actual-engineers were writing the code.
Now, however, they're NOT separate, & so therefore .. it makes sense to presume that the software-infrastructure in the avionics .. now is being vibecoded or just written without any vibes, by AI..
.. which ought ground them.
DO NOT entrust avionics to either lunatics or AI's.
_ /\ _
Musk already ran both companies. You don't think there's been direction from the top down to use AI to help write code for years now?