this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
61 points (98.4% liked)

Ukraine

11541 readers
386 users here now

News related to Ukraine

Matrix Space


Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷[Combat] videos containing footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW

No AI slop

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³ Defense Aid πŸ’₯


πŸ’³ Humanitarian Aid βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ


πŸͺ– Volunteer with the International Legionnaires


See also:

!nafo@lemm.ee

!combatvideos@SJW


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

they could fit more than twice as many shrapnel, if they used a more tetrahedron form, instead of spheres. but idk if it matters that they withstand less force. also, spheres are probably harder to produce, but maybe its faulty bearing balls, that arise anyway as a waste product.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And then their trajectory would not be straight and they would go all over the place, like the ground.

[–] fullsquare@awful.systems 5 points 1 day ago

they do that anyway, there's a lot of ground. balls have lowest drag per mass for randomly oriented tumbling object

load more comments (4 replies)