this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
6 points (80.0% liked)

Gaming

4393 readers
237 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!


Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:


If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think there was a beautiful 2 week period where games had open worlds that weren't just dead empty space everywhere.

[โ€“] MBech@feddit.dk 2 points 2 days ago

I think it's a tough balance. If I want to be immersed, there needs to be places where there's nothing. The world is full of places with nothing going on, and games should be allowed to reflect this. A game that is filled to the brim is stressful. My best example of this is Old School Runescape vs Runescape 3. Old School has plenty of places without anything actually useful, and it makes the places with something meaningful even more so. Runescape 3 is filled to the brim with all kinds of bullshit. It's literally impossible to walk for 30 seconds, without having something light up like a giant neon sign with the writing "PAY ATTENTION TO ME, LOOK HOW MUCH CONTENT THERE IS". It feels incredibly claustrophibic and like the game is doing everything it can to make you do anything but what you set out to do.

Of course, as mentioned at first, there needs to be balance, and a lot of open world games have had a very hard time finding this balance, but I really like those places where it's just a field with nothing particularly going on. It can serve as great world building to show that sometimes, a place is just a place, and doesn't have to be anything but a place.