this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2026
166 points (99.4% liked)
news
816 readers
522 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Thats a girl. Not a woman. A child.
And if they weren't a victim their faces wouldn't be hidden. Having your arms around a victim in your lap "isn't evidence of wrongdoing"?? Wow and just like that, "fact checking" is back in style.
That's not true given the current administration.
How do you know that?
Im going to assume you are being serious. I looked at the picture using my eyes.
Also why would the face be blocked if she was a consenting adult? The redactions were done reportedly to protect victims. Victims of child sexual abuse and trafficking.
Are you serious? You determined she's definitively <18 by looking at a photo of exclusively her body?
You'd have to ask Pam Bondi. They redacted all sorts of things, with no explanation provided. It would be completely reasonable to block out the faces of any women who were not involved in any way.
It might be Melania, as somebody pointed out here: https://lemmy.zip/comment/24360899