If this concept were rewritten, from the ground up, without any thought toward prior versions of it:
I think it would start with:
How much land, exactly, at a minimum, does every single person need, to sustain themselves? This amount of land should be given to every single human born, for free. The amount of land is actually small: it’s only the amount of land needed for a sustenance garden. Or, a sustenance garden, a few animals, a bed, a toilet. This is a very small amount of land. It’s certainly not even an acre or a half acre. In the middle ages, a sustenance garden was about ten feet by fifteen feet, and usually was filled with giant turnips because these were the most efficient use of a sustenance garden. Anyway, the basic kit provided to each newborn human by their worldwide fellows should be: just enough land to sustain themself as a native, and, just enough farming education and seeds and baby animals, and basic supplies for a bed, a small shelter (single enclosed small room simple shelter), simple basic toilet/plumbing/running water and/or outhouse system. A basic minimum size of land for each person. Maybe a quarter acre each? A third acre?
You're still talking about one of the most individualistic society one can imagine. And if someone is given property of land, it cannot be communism. Or socialism for that matter.
It's in the name you know? Communism or socialism are about doing things together. That's the polar opposite of you being alone on your private, self sustainable kingdom.
Marxism is fundamentally about collectivizing all of production and distribution. Anarchism is more about communalization. This goes somehow a third way, towards individualizing all of production. It's just preparing the basis for capitalism again, and you couldn't even establish this outright.
I did, and I maintain what I said.
Lmao no.
Maybe I could if you put some lines breaks (two spaces or a \ at the end of a sentence and then a newline)\
or split the paragraphs (put a blank line in between)