this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2026
108 points (100.0% liked)

Pop Culture

100 readers
63 users here now

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago (16 children)

Still finances bezos, good boy

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (10 children)

There's not really anywhere better to stream at the moment. YouTube moderation and chat (which he relies on for content) sucks, Kick is a chud casino for children, TikTok is now owned by Israel.

He's also just not going to be the one to develop anything new, he's simply too locked into his 8-10 hour daily streams to do that. There is an opportunity to kneecap Twitch though, if someone were to create a streaming platform that only streamers who are reliably getting 1-2K+ can stream on. Twitch loses money basically because of all the small streamers that eat up resources stream in 1440k60fps to like 15 people.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

He won’t obviously, cause of treatlerism and being tech averse, but he could start it

[–] princeofsin@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This guy could barely play games and yall think he can fund his own infrastructure is crazy

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

funding is very easy, you just have to part with money lmao. i'm not suggesting he will bumble with his own rack in a basement ffs

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

He really couldn't. Someone could approach him for seed money, but he's just a leftist himbo who shouts at his chat and eats food on stream as a full time job. He's not going to be developing anything. Investing is about the extent of what he's going to be capable of. At the beginning, it would likely only be him and maybe a couple other people that they could afford to have on there, and he would probably struggle to find and keep hosting, because it will be a lot easier for the ADL to harass hosting companies when it's just him.

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

p2p and hosting harassment curious-sickle not to mention how fuentes exists then?

And again viability of online peer streaming was demonstrated, a decade ago or more, the issue is finishing the damn thing (and making it popular enough, which might be a bigger hurdle)

[–] mkultrawide@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

Nick Fuentes exists because he's a government assets.

Alternatives exist, but an alternative that has low latency, high image quality, a strong chat function with emotes that can handle his extremely active chat, and strong moderation tool.

[–] ReadFanon@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

And again viability of online peer streaming was demonstrated, a decade ago or more, the issue is finishing the damn thing (and making it popular enough, which might be a bigger hurdle)

Doesn't PeerTube already do this?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)