Technology

79675 readers

3617 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

215

Meta's latest subscription move is an attempt to offset its AI bets (appleinsider.com)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by tonytins@pawb.social to c/technology@lemmy.world

78 comments fedilink hide all child comments

On January 26, Meta announced that it was going to test premium subscriptions across its apps. The subscriptions will offer exclusive features and expanded AI tools, while ad-supported versions remain free.

Under the test, users are presented with a clear choice between two paths. People can subscribe to use Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp without ads, or continue using the services for free while agreeing to ongoing data use for advertising purposes.

Meta claims the subscriptions will "unlock productivity, creativity, and AI-powered features," with each app receiving its own set of paid tools rather than a single bundled plan. The company isn't committing to one configuration and plans in order to experiment with different feature sets and pricing models over time.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sure but first, as an american, you have to make sure the doctor in question is ‘in network’

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

None of our doctors, in network or otherwise force us to Zuck’s apps lol.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sorry, the joke was about your ‘weird’ whatsapp communications vs our totally fuken stupid healthcare middlemen only exist to extract money from the doctor/patient relationship.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I wouldn’t call being forced to use a privacy invading, personal data harvesting, foreign-owned communications platform by nearly every facet of your society “weird”. I’d call it “deeply troubling”.