Linux

11523 readers

274 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Ategon@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev

108

Wayland didn’t kill Linux desktops, but it did expose their weakest assumptions [EDIT: Warning, article likely written with AI assistance] (www.xda-developers.com)

submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to c/linux@programming.dev

77 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bookmeat@lemmynsfw.com 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This article reads like AI slop. Lots of repetitive vague exposition. No concrete examples. The concept is alright, but it lacks any technical meat.

[–] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I was getting that AI vibe a bit as well, but there are parts that also felt human enough that made me question my gut feeling. I'm not terribly familiar with the XDA site itself, but having looked it up just now, they seem to cover AI a lot in their articles in a positive light, so I'd say it's quite likely the writer used AI to write it, and then tweaked it a bit.

Knowing that, I'm considering deleting this post...

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

It got some good conversations going though.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

It is XDA developers after all