this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
953 points (99.1% liked)

Leopards Ate My Face

9821 readers
342 users here now

Rules:

  1. The mods are fallible; if you've been banned or had a post/comment removed, please appeal.
  2. Off-topic posts will be removed. If you don't know what "Leopards ate my Face" is, try reading this post.
  3. If the reason your post meets Rule 1 isn't in the source, you must add a source in the post body (not the comments) to explain this. If the reason is in the source but is tedious to find (e.g. in a lengthy video), you must add an explanation for where it is.
  4. Posts should use high-quality sources (for a rough idea, check out this list), and posts should retain the title (if one exists) from works like news articles, videos, etc. You may (but need not) edit your post if the source changes the title. Other types of posts should have a title which accurately, relatively neutrally describes their contents.
  5. For accessibility reasons, an image of text must either have alt text or a transcription in the post body.
  6. Reposts within 1 year or the Top 100 of all time are subject to removal. Within moderator discretion, this doesn't just include reposts of the exact same media but also includes e.g. a secondary source telling basically the exact same story as another that was already posted.
  7. This is not exclusively a US politics community. You're encouraged to post stories about anyone from any place in the world at any point in history as long as you meet the other rules.
  8. All Lemmy.World Terms of Service apply.

Also feel free to check out:

Icon credit C. Brück on Wikimedia Commons.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Was he actually thinking that those $450 were just gifted by the exporter?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Tariffs are more of a soft ban than anything else. They're meant to function to protect local industry from cheap imports. And they don't even achieve that.

Case in point: in the 1980's I believe it was, Yamaha came out with their Virago line of cruiser motorcycles. They were objectively better than Harley-Davidsons and sold much cheaper, the only reason to buy a Harley was 1. because the gaing you're in requires ownership of one to be a member, 2. cosplaying as a member of said gang requires ownership of one, or 3. your boomer brain couldn't handle your motorcycle going duh-duh-duh-duh instead of duduh-duduh.

So Harley lobbied for and got a tariff on cruiser motorcycles of over I think it was 1200ccs engine displacement, which simply made the Japanese bikes cost more like what the American ones did. Yamaha responded by slightly treducing the cylinder bores to bring the displacement down to 1150cc making the tariff non-applicable and nothing of use was accomplished.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

A person could pay 100% tarriff on the cost of a Yamaha Virago(v-star) and it would still be cheaper than a Harley.

[–] jode@pawb.social 5 points 3 months ago

ESPECIALLY considering the long term costs of ownership

[–] evol@lemmy.today 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Jesus why are Harley's so expensive

Same reason Apple devices are so expensive. Because they can get away with it.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago