this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2026
518 points (99.4% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

5605 readers
832 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Mac@mander.xyz 0 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Why is Greenland shaded green?

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I’d accept Demark being in WHO.

Puerto Rico?

[–] Mac@mander.xyz 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, please do accept your own conflicting examples.

This was never a serious debate. I was meming about your wording (hence my "lol") and you got offended. There's much more nuance here, as everyone knows.

PR is still an unincorporated territory in comparison to California, and was invited to join on their own. But you can continue this debate with someone else, if you want, that was never my intent.

[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

If anyone is offended, it’s the person who took this conversation as “rude.”

Point is, unincorporated territory, country, state, autonomous territory, etc are just legal definitions of regions. And the purpose of the map is to show participating regions.

Depending too much on the literal definition of country misses the point of the map (unless the point is the shit on the US, something I would fully agree we are deserving of.) I would certainly understand a modified green/red stripe color to indicate the California participates but is part of a country that doesn’t. That feels honest and in the spirit of the map, dismissing California wholly doesn’t.