this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2026
86 points (100.0% liked)

Memes of Production

489 readers
567 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS
86
luigi x luigi (quokk.au)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/mop@quokk.au
 

Context: Luigi Galleani was an Italian Anarchist, who advocated for 'Propaganda of the Deed' - radical, direct action (political assassinations, bombings, etc).

He was arrested and exiled numerous times for his insurrectionist and anti-war views. Eventually growing disillusioned with labour movements and unionism for their reformist approaches. His followers were known as Galleanisti and were responsible for acts such as poisoning hundreds of high profile industrial/finance/law figures at a banquet a la the Red Wedding, attempting to bomb John D. Rockefeller, fighting in the Mexican revolution, bombing Wall Street, among other notable acts of resistance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How have you come to the conclusion that propaganda of the deed never works? I'm still on the fence about its effectiveness, especially in light of what happened after Charlie Kirk and Shinzo Abe were "styled upon".

  • Kirk's gone, and the Right have not been able to rally around a propagandist as charismatic as him (yet).
  • Abe was killed because of his connections to the Unification Church. Because of his assassination, the church lost their religious corporation status.

IMO, propaganda of the deed is not a substitute for organizing and social revolution, but... for people whose only language is terror, i.e. the tyrants, I'm not against terrorizing and assassinating these fuckers.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure about Abe, but Kirk was just yet another inevitable example of right-on-right violence and thus doesn't count.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 21 hours ago

I mean just because the shooter wasn't a leftist doesn't mean it wasn't propaganda of the deed, right? Like clearly, Kirk was targeted (rightly amerikkka) because of what he said (otherwise, why not shoot anyone else at the event?), I guess from a right-wing perspective.