this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
757 points (99.2% liked)
Comic Strips
21348 readers
2113 users here now
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
The rules are simple:
- The post can be a single image, an image gallery, or a link to a specific comic hosted on another site (the author's website, for instance).
- The comic must be a complete story.
- If it is an external link, it must be to a specific story, not to the root of the site.
- You may post comics from others or your own.
- If you are posting a comic of your own, a maximum of one per week is allowed (I know, your comics are great, but this rule helps avoid spam).
- The comic can be in any language, but if it's not in English, OP must include an English translation in the post's 'body' field (note: you don't need to select a specific language when posting a comic).
- Politeness.
- AI-generated comics aren't allowed.
- Adult content is not allowed. This community aims to be fun for people of all ages.
Web of links
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world: "I use Arch btw"
- !memes@lemmy.world: memes (you don't say!)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Funny story, though I do question the study they referred to, because there's different flavours of counter-culture that look pretty different from each other. Hipster is one, but there's also goth, emo, trench coat aesthetic, people who chase outdated trends, punk, metal, those who don't dress up any differently if they are going out or staying in, otaku (like the ones that wear clothes with hentai on them, I wouldn't call cosplaying a counter culture so much as a costume hobby unless cosplay wear is their default)...
All of those looks are very different from each other while not wanting to follow the main culture's trends and flaunting its definition of beauty.
And tbh, I'm not sure I'd even call hipsters a counter-culture. There was a desire to rebel, but looking at the aesthetic, I can't tell what they were really trying to rebel against. Looking sloppy? Business casual? Maybe it's because the aesthetic has been absorbed into the culture itself or maybe it was an advertiser-led "rebellion" in the first place? Or trying to be ahead of the curve means eventually the mainstream "catches up" and the look just looks normal now?
Also, thinking about it more, I wonder if the hilariously apt story was genuine or if someone there realized how they could really push their story by inventing an angry reader to prove their point.