this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2026
58 points (100.0% liked)
Games
21203 readers
70 users here now
Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.
Rules
- No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, or transphobia. Don't care if it's ironic don't post comments or content like that here.
- Mark spoilers
- No bad mouthing sonic games here :no-copyright:
- No gamers allowed :soviet-huff:
- No squabbling or petty arguments here. Remember to disengage and respect others choice to do so when an argument gets too much
- Anti-Edelgard von Hresvelg trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/games and submitted to the site administrators for review. :silly-liberator:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Oh right I see now. Yes. You and I both agree that part is not really the cause. Devs were being forced to crunch long before recent times and they had more optimised games in the past.
i guess i should have added that, crunch never left, it's just changed with the landscape. i agree that the cause of poorer optimizations stem from UE5 + mentioned "features."
but i wouldn't go so far as to say a modern day game dev as a worker is lazy, perhaps the leads and above in a AAA studio are, absolutely. but someone who directly works on a game? that's not an UE5 problem, moreso an industry problem.
Ahh I see. Yeah I don't mean that they are lazy overall but that they are being lazy about the optimisation specifically.
Or maybe I do mean lazy? In the past they might've dedicated a further 6 months of time to getting the optimisations right. Today they just release the game and slap a beta or early access sticker on it. That IS lazy. Individual workers within the company may not want that but it's laziness of the company overall.
to me, it's a bit too much of a generalization to say that poor optimizations are a product of laziness, but at this rate i am being pedantic. we both know something needs to change, and that framegen/upscale is certainly not the answer; even if we are on different pages of this issue, we both know what a good game looks like.
It looks like the way Overwatch runs at 300fps and is buttery fucking smooth. Say what you want about the company but holy shit it runs so well that I gauge just about everything else I play by how well that runs.
yeah… the company for my choice isn’t much better; halo infinite. I won’t consistently get 300 fps, but it doesn’t need all the upscaling crutches to make it run and look nice. I get 100fps and I’m quite happy with that.
i don't even think the overwatch graphics options have framegen or upscaling in them at all lol
that they all love breast milk?