this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2026
186 points (99.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

14370 readers
440 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What defines "unsafe"? Amazon drivers were getting penalized for "taking their eyes off the road" when they were looking at their rear view mirrors. I don't trust the insurance company's systems to know when an "unsafe" action is actually the better option.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

If those stupid little OBD port modules from the insurance company are anything to go by, slamming your brakes because someone cut you off at a normally safe speed will ding you.

Suddenly stopping because you rear ended that idiot to avoid the ding will also likely ding you.

In theory, on average, your rates should go down because these sudden changes in motion shouldn't be statistically common, but it's controlled by profit-seeking entities, so in practice it's just more unsurprising authoritarian corporate spyware that can't get the whole picture, scolding you and justifying your punishment.

[–] bdama@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you trust a multi million corporation to fairly implement this sort of system and not squeeze their customers for every cent?

[–] bdama@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not advocating for the insurance company and never said to trust them or their definitions. Stop trying to turn this into something it's not.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

You were the one that mentioned "premiums" and not "fines".