this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
150 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

455 readers
117 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
  2. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  3. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 4 days ago (5 children)

The EU must be delusional if they think this would scare the US off. They can't keep thinking they can just get by like in their coalition days when America did all the heavy lifting if they sent some token force. This time Americans are the enemy and they do not fuck around when they want to seize territory.

[–] guy@piefed.social 14 points 4 days ago

This isn't a potential war against some unheard of country on the other side of the world with a communist regime. This is a potential war against friends over a territory a majority of Americans doesn't support invading.

It doesn't matter how much shock and awe the US have when the population will lose their shit and topple the government. I bet the US could occupy Greenland within half a day but a couple of months later the new US administration will beg the EU to tell them exactly how much they need to grovel for this to be forgiven.

[–] varnia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 days ago

Sending EU military to Greenland was not to intimidate US - how could we? It was about delegitimizing Trumps claim that Greenland could be claimed easily by Russia or China.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago

Initially deployed were a small number of troops, about thirty personnel.[10][11][12] However, the initial military planners, reconnaissance teams, were not intended to deter US action by themselves alone. They were to coordinate the arrival of larger land, sea, and air forces publicly pledged by France, and/or other European states: "As well as providing a show of political support, the European troops were said to be on a short scoping mission, according to one country involved. The aim was to establish what a more sustained ground deployment in Greenland could look like, partly to reassure the US that European NATO members were serious about Arctic security".[13] The troops also act as a tripwire force, such that an attack against them would be considered an act of aggression against the European partners and reacted to accordingly.[14]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Arctic_Endurance

[–] Ooops@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah, please let me see the US do all the heavy lifting in Greenland...

Without a reasonable amount of troups trained or equipment for artic operations, without ice breaker or ships certified for artic conditions and without the NATO airfields in Canada, Iceland or Norway their airforce would use to operate in that area.

Also: maybe you could start getting your ideas from reality instead of Hollywood bullshit and look up who makes up the majority of NATO personal- and equipment-wise, even when we are not talking about the artic in particular, where the US just plainj sucks.

[–] moopet@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)
[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago

The US is good at seizing territory but dog shit at holding it. It'll be a long protracted war that'll weaken the Western powers which is exactly what Russia and China want. I hope it never comes to war among NATO members but considering how awful and erratic Trump is this might actually happen.