this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
306 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

78828 readers
2337 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

You would think that RAM manufacturers would ramp up production. Hopefully the fact that they aren't means the bubble is going to burst within a couple of years.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt it will take a couple years. They're burning through so much cash right now that they'll be bankrupt in a couple years and despite sunk cost fallacy they won't let it get that bad. At some point they'll cut their losses and pivot to some other new fad. The small handful of uses that make sense will stick around and a few companies will be in just the right place to make it turn a profit but the vast majority won't. Some will go bankrupt (if we're lucky Meta and/or X will be one of them) and some will just write it off as a failed experiment. Either way just as hard as prices spiked we'll see them cratering before they rebound back to normal. Six months would be highly optimistic, but a year probably isn't out of the question.

Of course all of this might be moot if Shitler manages to start WW3 by attacking Greenland. If that happens RAM prices will be the least of everyone's worries.

[–] brightwindow@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Practically all DRAM production is sold out for next year, there isn't going to be any significant new supply into the consumer market in that timeframe. Also, when these massive piles of memory end up sitting in a warehouse because the bubble pops, this stock will never make it to the consumer market, because AI data centres use HBM, which is soldered directly to motherboards in such a way that it's impossible to turn it into modules again. Even if all the DRAM producers start selling to the consumer market jan 1st 2027, the pent up demand will still probably keep prices high.

All that to say, I don't think prices will crater.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Those shenzen mofos can figure out a solution to utilize that ram mark my words

[–] 0tan0d@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Im sure china will and the tradional manufacturers will cry about losing market share while begging for tarrifs and handouts.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It takes time to build factories, the big three RAM manufacturers apparently think AI is a bubble, although that could just be an excuse for price fixing.

China's cxmt is apparently ramping up production, but they're still relatively small.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

China is pushing hard to make their domestic brands the new standard world wide so they're not worried about whether the bubble pops or not. They want to drive prices down even if that means selling at a loss because they know that's what it's going to take to dislodge the entrenched players. For better or worse it's likely a winning strategy because the existing players are more concerned with maximizing their quarterly profits rather than meeting any kind of consumer demand or indeed even selling to consumers at all.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They are ramping up production. But it all goes to AI data centers.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Why can't anyone go against the current and sell to individual customers only?

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I as a customer pay, idk, 10€ per gb of RAM and an AI data center pays 20, do you really think they are going to consider how they are feeding a bubble that in the not-so-long term will burst and fuck them up too?

Nah, mate, they are capitalists, they only care about the money they can make in the extremely short term.

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 3 points 20 hours ago

But bulk orders typically cost less

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Selling in bulk is convenient for manufacturers too.

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 10 points 1 day ago

Because consumer sales is slow and expensive.

What do you think costs more? Building RAM sticks for individual users who'll pay $200-300 per 8/16 DRAM modules, or building sticks for enterprise customers who in one single order will spend millions of USD? Also latter requires no fancy packaging, marketing, or variations in the product.

Profits.

And if say SK Hynux decides to only sell to consumers, Samsung and the others will sell even more to data enters because there's more cash to be made.

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

No small ask. New factories, new supply chains, more staff, etc.