AskHistorians

1205 readers

7 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Patnou@lemmy.world

In your opinion who was the better president Washington or Lincoln and why? (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 days ago by Patnou@lemmy.world to c/askhistorians@lemmy.world

18 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I find it hard to accept the argument that Lincoln was acting imperialistically when there were millions of enslaved people, not to mention women, without any say in the decision to succeed from the Union.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Slavery looks no more than just an excuse. "Bad local laws" in the neighbourhood should never be a reason for annexation.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Only if "bad federal laws" (re: laws that don't allow us to benefit from the subjugation of an entire people) aren't a good reason for secession.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Bad local laws” in the neighbourhood should never be a reason for annexation.

Uh, I didn't realize you were an advocate for a wealthy minority holding secession votes at gunpoint.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Gunpoint, huh? As you say...

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, particularly in Virginia, where armed Confederate soldiers 'monitored' the vote, in addition to out-of-state Confederate soldiers casting votes in the election.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

The north didn’t force South Carolina to fire at Fort Sumter. I find your hand waiving away the evil that was chattel slavery to be weird and gross, too.