By Laura M. Henning, Associated Civic News Bureau, Fairhaven, Ind.
FAIRHAVEN, Ind. — A northern Indiana teenager was questioned by federal authorities after an automated alert tied to his online electronics purchases prompted an investigation that ultimately revealed a small-scale renewable energy experiment, officials said.
According to law enforcement officials, the inquiry began after Amazon flagged what it described as an unusual purchasing pattern involving four Raspberry Pi microcomputers, supercapacitors, LEDs, carbon rods and electrodes. The information was referred to federal authorities as part of a broader effort to identify potentially suspicious activity tied to technical equipment.
Agents later discovered the 17-year-old had been installing small devices in the soil near landscaped areas outside a Target superstore in Fairhaven, a town of about 8,000 residents roughly 40 miles northeast of Indianapolis.
“At first glance, it raised concerns,” said Special Agent Mark Rourke, a spokesperson for the FBI’s Indianapolis field office. “You have electronics, wiring, energy storage components, and devices placed in the ground near a commercial property. That’s something we take seriously.”
After interviews and a review of the equipment, authorities determined the devices were plant-microbial fuel cells, a type of experimental system that generates small amounts of electricity by harnessing naturally occurring bacteria in soil.
The teen told investigators he was using the system to slowly charge a portable battery, which he then used to power his phone.
“He explained that it was an experiment,” Rourke said. “Once we understood what it was and what it wasn’t, there was no indication of criminal intent.”
The teen, whose name was not released because he is a minor, said he had learned about the technology through online research and science forums. He said he chose the retail property because of its large landscaped areas.
“He told us he felt the parking lot had taken away green space and quality of life,” Rourke said. “In his words, he thought generating a little power from the plants was fair.”
Target declined to comment on the specific incident but said in a statement that any installations on company property require prior approval.
No charges were filed. Authorities did, however, warn the teen that installing devices on private property without permission is not allowed, regardless of intent.
The devices were removed, and the teen agreed not to reinstall them.
Technology and energy experts said the case highlights how automated systems can misinterpret benign activity.
“Plant-microbial fuel cells are real, but they’re niche and unfamiliar to most people,” said Dr. Elaine Porter, an environmental engineering professor at Purdue University. “When you combine that with algorithms looking for patterns, you can end up with a lot of false alarms.”
Officials emphasized that the investigation was resolved quickly once the facts were clear.
“This wasn’t about shutting down curiosity,” Rourke said. “It was about making sure there wasn’t a risk to public safety.”
The teen’s family said he plans to continue experimenting with renewable energy projects, but this time on permitted land.
“He learned a lesson,” a family member said. “Mostly about where you’re allowed to plug into the world. And how Amazon is watching you.”
This is fake, and this account has created this community of literally-fake news. The way this is being posted without context makes this definitionally misinformation at best, and disinformation at worst. Check this community's sidebar.
To anyone who is reading this, adjust your blocklists or user tags accordingly.
To the OP: you need to put this somewhere in your posts, and not just the sidebar of your community. Many people come here from a feed. So, here I am, doing it for you, since you can't be bothered.
Thank you for that, and thank you for looking out for Amazon. They care so much about their workers and their communities, I would hate to think that my story would put them in a bad light. What a horrible, terrible oversight on my part.
I just replied in another thread, but you know, this is another example of why I dislike these, and will continue to push you to label your lies. Whenever anyone calls you on this, your immediate strawman is "oh, you must be shilling for the corporations".
Not only is that just the laziest straw man, but it's also actively damaging to the actual anti-corporate, antifascist cause which you so ineffectually claim to espouse. Your stories are barely different from the actual shit these corporations do, and muddying the waters with a bunch of lies only serves to make people call it crying wolf when they corporations are actually pulling something.
I responded in that other thread. I'll repost here:
Only because it's well known now. It didn't start out that way. Look up the history of it. They didn't mention they were satire. People slowly found out, then the word got out. But in no way did they start out with wanting you to know the punchline, before the joke landed.
Thank you, but meh, I think Lemmy has room for me. I mean, there was that story about chinese space agency training prisoners for a space mission by making them take apart and use Radio Shack TRS-80 computers and Atari 800XL. I do feel bad about.
Oh and the dude with armor made from the cans of soda he stole from Walmart. Man, that really put walmart in a poor light. Not cool. You're right.
Think about what you are being upset about. Go and read the stories in this forum. What is there to be mad about exactly? Also some are in on the joke and don't mind. You mind, obviously. But come one man, this is the thing you are going to be mad about? In the world today? Mad about a story about someone who knits hats out of hair he takes from hair salons.
Brah, come on now...
Friend, you are taking this WAY too seriously. I don't want my responses to rile you up any more than they have, but let's clarify on what you are really mad about? What have I posted that has done any harm. Serious question. Find a story that you think has caused harm and let's discuss it. But really read the article first. And think about why you are really mad.
If ya don't like the meta vibe, you can block. I get that not everyone is on bored. But I've also gotten positive feedback. It's Lemmy. No one is even here. lol
You're moving the goalposts. My claim has been, and continues to be, that it is your framing of these stories, their near-plausibility, and your clearly disingenuous trolling and strawmanning when challenged, that have made me take this seriously. If there were ANY indication that these were satire to a user coming from a feed, who cannot see your sidebar, then I would take no issue. If you weren't so glib when called out, I would reserve judgement. But here we are.
The framing of the stories, the near-plausibility is the point. I am not doing anything different that what the onion started out as. And I make no apologies. Lemmy will not be destroyed because of anything I post. Besides, no one is here anyway, so you are being mad about a little-known, rarely seen comedy show that you despise. How much influence do you think Lemmy has in the real world?! lol
Allow me to level with you:
I am as close as I believe is possible to being a priest of knowledge. I genuinely believe that communication in bad faith is a detriment to the world. I came to this platform to avoid the propaganda and censorship of knowledge on Reddit. And I have found this community on Lemmy (which you so disparage as to call it nonexistent) where, for the most part (aside from the tankies), people interact honestly, if melodramatically. The thing with which I take issue here is, ultimately, that these posts — this community — contribute to a dissolution of trust in what is true, wearing the trappings of journalism, but without anything real. That the person posting these lies appears so flippant toward the concerns and criticism of others makes me more concerned. I do not take lightly a troll in my midst.
But, ultimately, my problem with your posts can be reduced to this:
And again, I think Lemmy has enough room for people like me, if if you don't like it. And if I were actually a troll, I wouldn't just post my articles to my own community. And I'm make them more serious than a guy making mountain dew can armor. So we'll have to agree to disagree.
And I gotta be honest, your graphic is so, so true. Because um, well, I couldn't resist: https://reddthat.com/post/58317046
I love it. And other than the dog leashing bit, I stand by it.
❤️