this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
8 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23212 readers
196 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm aware that the best defense is the threat of total annihilation to any country or group that shoots a missile at north America.

Consequences and strategic viability aside, what would happen if one, two, or a true promise number of missiles were launched at Ottawa? Is it that they would need to take an orbital trajectory and as such would be defended by similarly launched defenses?

What about the UK? Are there THAAD batteries dotting the perimiter of london just hidden?

Or is it just one of those fun illusions of safety that could be broken by a sufficiently determined group?

I (probably obviously) don't know anything about the military beyond stuff posted in the news mega

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tervell@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are there THAAD batteries dotting the perimiter of london just hidden

There are literally just like, ten THAAD batteries in the entire world - the US has seven with an eighth on the way (although it may have already been delivered, not sure), one in Korea, one in Guam, three in in the US itself, and two were deployed to Israel to help defend against Iran, although I'm not sure if they're still there or have been moved elsewhere since. The UAE has another two, and the Saudis another one, with six more ordered but who knows when delivery will actually take place. Beyond the number of batteries themselves, there's also the question of munitions, a substantial portion of which were expended defending Israel, and will take a while to replace (No THAADs ’til 2027: Missile defense experts warn of interceptor ‘gap’).

When it comes to less advanced systems like the Patriot or SAMP/T, there's a lot more of them, so I guess stopping a handful of missiles might be viable, but Ukraine, with probably one of the densest air defense networks around (courtesy of lots of inherited Soviet systems combined with Western military aid), way more capable than pretty much any NATO country other than the US, is still getting hammered, so it doesn't really seem like anyone has an air defense that can handle a sustained campaign.

[–] Acute_Engles@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

I knew a news thread mega brain would find me.

Thank you