this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
762 points (99.0% liked)
Funny
13001 readers
1887 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And you're too dense to understand that literally every human being who's ever lived or ever will is capable of drawing the inherent connection between the skull and crossbones and death, due to the inherent relationship between them.
Literally Carl Sagan even proposed using the symbol. Is he too dense to understand too?
YES, WHICH IS CONNECTED TO GRAVES, AND THUS VALUABLES
Which part of this sentence is too complex for you?
Not every grave contains valuables, and ones that do would be marked with more elaborate symbols and ornamentation.
Nobody's tombstone has a skull and crossbones on it, your argument is completely detached from reality
There are literally millions of graves without elaborate symbols or ornamentation, but with valuables. What the fuck?
You're imagining a future civilization will be so devolved that they would have less colors than we do? You're not even approaching this from a standpoint of reality, so I'm done here.
Yes, there are indeed many objects in our daily lives with colors that stone-age people would have never seen in their whole lives. I can't even comprehend how this could be a difficult concept for you.
And there you go assuming they would be stone age. We've come full circle.