this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
579 points (94.1% liked)

Sync for Lemmy

15088 readers
3 users here now

๐Ÿ‘€


Welcome to Sync for Lemmy!

Download Sync for Lemmy


Welcome to the official Sync for Lemmy community.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Community Rules


1- No advertising or spam.

All types of advertising and spam are restricted in this community.



Community Credits

Artwork and community banner by: @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I did a poll and nearly 30% of the people who voted said they used Sync! It's stayed around that percent the whole time too!

EDIT: Here is the poll I forgot to put this here like five times lol https://strawpoll.com/wby5A21R1yA

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] raevn@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Like Lemmy is to Reddit, FOSS clients are to paid alternatives.

The only way I can see to stay clear of business practices I don't like is to support the FOSS model.

I'm not saying Sync isn't a good client, or that the dev has anything other than the best intersts of his users in mind, it's that at any point a decision can be made which you have no control over. Service models for software, for example, very rarely seems to be in the users interests.

Give the FOSS clients a shot, they are also constantly improving!

[โ€“] chaircat 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's that at any point a decision can be made which you have no control over

This is true for any software you didn't write. Plenty of FOSS software has gone in directions I didn't like.

The only real difference is whether decision makers have a profit motive. That's important, but that said, it's not everything.

[โ€“] raevn@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And at any time you or someone else who is likewise pissed off can fork the software and put it straight

[โ€“] Neve8028@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's really not a valid argument for 99% of users. I'm not going to fork FOSS software because I'm an adult and have a full time job. I don't have the time to learn about the inner workings of the software to fix it. Most users are less tech savvy than myself, anyways. Saying "just fork it and fix it to your liking" to the average person is not realistic.

[โ€“] raevn@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

If you're not happy with the software there's a good chance others are also dissatisfied and van make the chage, this happens all the time. Perhaps some of them are children without a full time job and don't mind spending time understanding something ;-) The point I'm making is that the users of the software have an additional option not available to closed source software.

load more comments (18 replies)