this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2026
43 points (85.2% liked)
GenZedong
5036 readers
145 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments

This is beyond obvious sarcasm. The tone is completely opposite of BE and, unless he had a stroke and got fettermanned, this is him making a point about using such language to defend veterans and people who join the armed forces in general.
He doesn't make that clear, and if it is, it makes no sense.
I mean, I assume you know of BE and his antics, which is why you posted this with your caption.
With that in mind, I have exactly zero idea how you could read even the first sentence and not see it oozing sarcasm. If you read any of his other posts on any topic, then its almost impossible to not see this imo.
If it had been a random twitter handle? Sure, but BE? Nah, he doesn't make excuses like that.
This is the unadulterated and empty rage bait that we know and hate from BE
He does, especially for himself, and he attacks trans and fat people. He should make it clear or be held liable for what he says.
Fully agreed. I think you are mistaking us clarifying the sarcasm of BE as us saying "he deliberately made a dumb point on this topic to make a good point somewhere else!"
We just wanted to make sure that we all dislike him for the correct reasons and not for him having libbed up opinions because he made them sarcastically.
Oh, that's fair.
Sorry if my replies are terse, I am not feeling well, but I agree with what you said.
He also denies genocide in Chile and Argentina.
When he said that on Twitter, was that taken out of context?
Please read my other comment. We both, and all in this thread I assume, agree. You just made it sound like you believe that BE actually has this radlib opinion.
If you don't, then that's great. I don't understand your caption in that case, but I also don't care.
All your follow ups and replies you agree to in here are on point. Your caption probably just confused me/us. Please don't think that anyone here is actually defending BE