this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
113 points (99.1% liked)

GOG

3515 readers
1 users here now

GOG.com is a DRM-free games and movies distribution service that is part of the CD Projekt Group. GOG.com is also a "sister" company to CD Projekt Red, developers of the Witcher series and Cyberpunk 2077.

Rules:

  1. No piracy discussion
  2. No harassment
  3. For post that is not in English, Please tag the language

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 month ago (7 children)

To be fair, Steam/Valve shouldn't be the one that judge the quality of the game, it should be the customers by voting with their wallets.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

While I agree there are people who still buy those crap, so gotta put this here:

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And they'll enjoy the game or refund it, since both options are incredibly easy to do.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Of course but I meant people who buy for buying's sake, for +1 on the badge.

There are also some cases you cannot refund after 14 days, happened to me once.

[–] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Who the fuck cares?

[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

It's true, but so are those that run things. Billionaires, politicians, CEOs, they are all.

[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 month ago

nice slur you got there.....

[–] NachBarcelona@piefed.social -1 points 1 month ago

What a complete and utter idiot this piece of crap is.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

I would guess that he's looking for a response to someone pointing out that Steam has a larger game library than GOG.

Like, he's gonna say "yes, but a higher proportion of the excluded games aren't good".

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Agreed. Open publication, as opposed to gatekeeping publication, is desirable for creative expression in society.

Just imagine how many great works never saw the light of day or reached completion because publishers didn't bite. Obviously the internet and digital media broke this dynamic to a degree, but I'm sure it's a significant amount.

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

However they've banned games without reason many times. Wanting to be a broad marketplace is fine, but I just wish they were either committed to the bit or went back to curation because they had a higher density of good games back in the days of Greenlight.

[–] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the market will decide. And famously, the market has always been good at deciding.

No, I think that's bullshit. I think Valve should curate more of their games. I don't think they should allow Nazi trash and fucking hate crime simulators on their platform.

[–] muhyb@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Steam has more trash than games nowadays. I wish they never stopped curating games. At least to some degree even if not fully.

[–] Lipriv30@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

No one likes a devil’s advocate.

[–] SculptusPoe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Yeah, I've enjoyed some games that wouldn't have made the cut if cuts were to be made. I don't want steam curating what is on there. Sounds like GoG does, which is another reason not to use it I suppose. (I guess I was being a little rhetorical there, I actually plan on checking GOG more often and even installed their store program on my PC last night to make checking easier. Still, I don't think throwing shade at Steam over being a platform for selling games that is more open is how to draw in business.)