this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2026
69 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk technology

3806 readers
42 users here now

Technology for a Solar-Punk future.

Airships and hydroponic farms...

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Meshnet is cool, but not an Internet replacement, there's nowhere near enough bandwidth.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not for AI-generated JPEGs and YouTube ads, sure.
For organizing and communicating what actually matters? It's plenty.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

It can do useful things, certainly, but it's easy for people to misunderstand what it actually is and does. It's closer in function to texting than it is the web.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 3 points 17 hours ago

You're right, it is closer to texting. Which means you're competing with private gargantuan monopolies with only $50 and a few friends.

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Texting to whom, though, no? Especially online communication suffers from the people you want to communicate to not being on the platform. And since people organize in loose clusters you need to convince a majority of your cluster to adopt the platform. This is especially difficult when there are more popular alternatives that are not interoperable with others.

Mesh networks are potentially better because they are more resilient and don't lock you into inoperability with other systems. But before this resilience is tested, how do you demonstrate the upside? Especially mesh networks require nodes in proximity.

Functions could be extended and you could provide services over the mesh using automatic messaging (all with reasonable respect for the available bandwidth). But more complex services require reliability. Isn't this why it lacks adoption?

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I think it lacks adoption because people assume it's trying to compete with the Internet as it exists now.
There have been experiments in delivering Wikipedia pages over sms.
If the current Internet fails (or is encouraged to become useless), Meshtastic might be the only way to get information from Wikipedia (mirrors).

[–] BenjiRenji@feddit.org 2 points 17 hours ago

Right, that wouldbe the "testing resilience" case I mentioned. Setting up a node ain't trivial though (I'm procrastinating to do just that right now), so I wonder about the required preparedness.

I expect the utility and reliability to grow with the number of users though.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 2 points 17 hours ago

I picked ours up as an emergency backup communication to radios during disasters. Wouldn't want to rely on it though, not always super dependable