this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
63 points (100.0% liked)

Sino

8416 readers
166 users here now

This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.

Rules:

  1. Follow the Hexbear Code Of Conduct.

  2. Imperialism will result in a ban.

  3. Sinophobic content will be removed.


Newcomer Welcome Wiki


FAQ:


China Guides:


Multimedia:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18428

China released an official report on Thursday stating that Japan “may already have produced weapons-grade plutonium in secret” and “has the technological and economic capabilities to achieve nuclear armament in a short period of time”. The report assessing Japan’s nuclear threat cited former US president Joe Biden’s direct message to Chinese President Xi Jinping that Japan had the capacity to have nuclear weapons “virtually overnight”. Biden first disclosed the information in an interview with...


From China - South China Morning Post via This RSS Feed.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Honestly the workaround to MAD weapons is to get a proxy to destroy itself engaging in a MAD war with an enemy of your choosing (so Japan vs China for example)

[–] SouffleHuman@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I'm assuming that on the scale and resources of a great power, there's nothing really stopping one from just nuking all potential adversaries in a MAD scenario (whether directly at war or not) to deter against this exact situation. That's why the US and Russia each have thousands of nukes, and why China is also aiming to get over a thousand. Things like international norms or plausible deniability probably fall by the wayside in an existential conflict.

[–] Damarcusart@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I was thinking the US's strategy might be. Though it would probably be hard for them to find a proxy that is both stable enough to build nuclear weapons and also suicidal enough to use them.

[–] ColombianLenin@hexbear.net 2 points 2 months ago
[–] marxisthayaca@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Why would china not aim nukes at the US, at that point? You don’t want your enemy to still be standing.