this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
63 points (100.0% liked)
Sino
8416 readers
166 users here now
This is a comm for news, information, and discussion on anything China and Chinese related.
Rules:
-
Imperialism will result in a ban.
-
Sinophobic content will be removed.
Newcomer Welcome Wiki
FAQ:
China Guides:
Multimedia:
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Honestly the workaround to MAD weapons is to get a proxy to destroy itself engaging in a MAD war with an enemy of your choosing (so Japan vs China for example)
I'm assuming that on the scale and resources of a great power, there's nothing really stopping one from just nuking all potential adversaries in a MAD scenario (whether directly at war or not) to deter against this exact situation. That's why the US and Russia each have thousands of nukes, and why China is also aiming to get over a thousand. Things like international norms or plausible deniability probably fall by the wayside in an existential conflict.
Yeah, that's what I was thinking the US's strategy might be. Though it would probably be hard for them to find a proxy that is both stable enough to build nuclear weapons and also suicidal enough to use them.
Counter point
Why would china not aim nukes at the US, at that point? You don’t want your enemy to still be standing.