this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
425 points (99.3% liked)

Boycott US

1844 readers
608 users here now

Overview:

The community dedicated to boycotting the US until they stop fascism, restore full democracy and start following international law.

Americans have a moral obligation to resist Donald Trump and project 2025 at every turn.

America is a flawed democracy currently being ruled by oligarchs. Stop the backslide! Dont let America become the next Hungary.

America needs to challenge the court rulings of citizens united v. fec and shelby county v. holder, protect the media, implement independent district drawing, and the single transferable vote so they don't end up having people stay home in life-changing elections because they cannot vote for their favourite candidate.

Join 50501.chat to fight back!


Related communities:

Boycott:!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyeuropean@feddit.uk

!boycott@lemmy.sdf.org

!boycottchina@sopuli.xyz

Activism:!antitrumpalliance@lemmy.world

!petitions@lemmy.ca

!palestine@lemmy.dbzer0.com

!protest@lemmy.world

!israelicrimes@lemmy.world

!patriotsforprogress@lemmy.ca

!goodsuniteus@lemmy.ca


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 3 days ago (1 children)

“Every congressional democrat and every democrat who’s running for president should be asked a simple question: Do you think this officer was wrong in defending his life against a deranged leftist who tried to run him over?” Vance wrote in a post on X.

Engaging in any response implicitly agrees on the premise of his question. That 1. The agent was defending his life. 2. That someone tried to run him over. 3. That that person was a deranged leftist.

It's a loaded question from the start that must be refused outright.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Engaging in any response implicitly agrees on the premise of his question

The only valid response is "JD Vance is lying to you".