97
Samsung, SK Reportedly Hike Server DRAM Prices 60-70% – Google, Microsoft in the Queue
(www.trendforce.com)
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
And that's in an environment where DRAM output is significantly ramping up:
https://www.theverge.com/news/847344/micron-ram-memory-shortage-2026-earnings
https://www.tweaktown.com/news/109011/sk-hynix-to-boost-dram-production-by-a-huge-8x-in-2026-still-wont-be-enough-for-ram-shortages/index.html
EDIT: Also:
Just a few years ago, they were losing a ton of money due to low DRAM prices, so I imagine that rejecting long-term contracts at current (already high) prices drives even more home that they expect demand to increase further relative to supply:
https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/SK-HYNIX-INC-6494929/news/SK-Hynix-reports-Q2-loss-as-chip-glut-continues-44417161/
SK 8xing production is impressive. I know open ai bought ~40% of microns memory production. So increasing production by only 20% is pretty low. But like you said they had horribly low (for them) ram prices for a few years so they’re just trying to avoid that.
Sk must be banking on Micron not matching the spike.
IIRC Micron was the only Big Three DRAM manufacturer that OpenAI didn't sign a contract with. I think that they signed contracts with SK Hynix and Samsung for their supply, and didn't with Micron.
searches
Yeah:
https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/01/openai-ropes-in-samsung-sk-hynix-to-source-memory-chips-for-stargate/
Not signing was actually probably to Micron's advantage; I understand that OpenAI didn't let Samsung know that they were negotiating with SK Hynix and didn't let SK Hynix that they were negotiating with Samsung and signed both deals concurrently. That is, each of Samsung and SK Hynix probably sold the DRAM that went to OpenAI for less than they could have gotten on the open market, since neither was aware at the time of signing that the supply on the open market outside of themselves would sharply decrease during the period of the contract, which would be expected to drive up prices.
I mean, they still made a lot more money than they had been making. Just that they could have probably managed to get even more money for the DRAM that they sold.
IIRC the 40% number was OpenAI signing for 40% of global production output, not for any particular company's output.