this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
97 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

78511 readers
3524 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tal@lemmy.today 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

According to TrendForce, the boom is expected to continue, as conventional DRAM contract prices in 1Q26 are forecast to rise 55–60% QoQ, while NAND Flash prices are expected to increase 33–38% QoQ.

And that's in an environment where DRAM output is significantly ramping up:

https://www.theverge.com/news/847344/micron-ram-memory-shortage-2026-earnings

Micron aims to ramp up production and expects to increase its shipments of DRAM and NAND flash memory by 20 percent next year

https://www.tweaktown.com/news/109011/sk-hynix-to-boost-dram-production-by-a-huge-8x-in-2026-still-wont-be-enough-for-ram-shortages/index.html

SK hynix to boost DRAM production by a huge 8x in 2026, still won't be enough for RAM shortages

EDIT: Also:

The memory sector has surged into a full-blown seller’s market, with both South Korean giants rejecting long-term agreements (LTAs) of two to threes years and sticking to quarterly contracts, anticipating stepwise DRAM price increases each quarter through 2027, the report suggests.

Just a few years ago, they were losing a ton of money due to low DRAM prices, so I imagine that rejecting long-term contracts at current (already high) prices drives even more home that they expect demand to increase further relative to supply:

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/SK-HYNIX-INC-6494929/news/SK-Hynix-reports-Q2-loss-as-chip-glut-continues-44417161/

SK Hynix reports Q2 loss as chip glut continues

SEOUL (Reuters) -South Korea's SK Hynix posted a quarterly operating loss on Wednesday, as the company said the memory chip market is beginning to recover from a deep downturn.

Published on 07/25/2023 at 07:29 pm EDT

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

SK 8xing production is impressive. I know open ai bought ~40% of microns memory production. So increasing production by only 20% is pretty low. But like you said they had horribly low (for them) ram prices for a few years so they’re just trying to avoid that.

Sk must be banking on Micron not matching the spike.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I know open ai bought ~40% of microns memory production.

IIRC Micron was the only Big Three DRAM manufacturer that OpenAI didn't sign a contract with. I think that they signed contracts with SK Hynix and Samsung for their supply, and didn't with Micron.

searches

Yeah:

https://techcrunch.com/2025/10/01/openai-ropes-in-samsung-sk-hynix-to-source-memory-chips-for-stargate/

OpenAI ropes in Samsung, SK Hynix to source memory chips for Stargate

Not signing was actually probably to Micron's advantage; I understand that OpenAI didn't let Samsung know that they were negotiating with SK Hynix and didn't let SK Hynix that they were negotiating with Samsung and signed both deals concurrently. That is, each of Samsung and SK Hynix probably sold the DRAM that went to OpenAI for less than they could have gotten on the open market, since neither was aware at the time of signing that the supply on the open market outside of themselves would sharply decrease during the period of the contract, which would be expected to drive up prices.

I mean, they still made a lot more money than they had been making. Just that they could have probably managed to get even more money for the DRAM that they sold.

IIRC the 40% number was OpenAI signing for 40% of global production output, not for any particular company's output.