this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
337 points (98.0% liked)

UK Politics

4554 readers
122 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

THE BBC has told its reporters not to use the word “kidnapped” when describing the US government’s allegedly illegal abduction of Venezuelan leader Nicolas Maduro.

The directive was revealed by The National contributor Owen Jones, who said it had been passed to him by a member of BBC staff.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

why the BBC doesn't say the Hamas gunmen who carried out appalling atrocities in southern Israel are terrorists.

Read the bold text and tell me with a straight face that is neutral language.

Also the BBC calls Hamas terrorists in plenty of articles.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Also the BBC calls Hamas terrorists in plenty of articles.

Then it will be very straightforward for you to find one. Not "the UK government has designated as terrorists", but them actually calling Hamas terrorists.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I couldn't find one example in my cursory search. It's your claim, back it up or piss off.

Read the bold text and tell me with a straight face that is neutral language.

Maybe you're mistaking me for someone else? I never said I thought the BBC is neutral. Me asking for a source for your unlikely claim doesn't mean I'm attacking everything you said. Stick to the point.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Scroll down instead of pretending that this hasn't been debunked in this thread.

[–] HermitBee@feddit.uk 1 points 4 days ago

Scroll down instead of pretending that this hasn't been debunked in this thread.

I get a notification on my app, I reply. Funnily enough I'm not actually keeping up-to-date with what you have to say elsewhere.

The trouble is, I agree with you about the BBC and neutrality.

But spouting bullshit you refuse to back up (seriously, just one link to an article where the BBC call Hamas terrorists, that's all I'm asking) lowers the quality of the debate for everyone, and makes the rest of your argument look weak.