Enough Musk Spam

3313 readers

2 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

jordanpeterson@lemmy.world

an0nym0us@lemmy.dbzer0.com

431

Musk at it again (discuss.online)

submitted 3 months ago by bytesonbike@discuss.online to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

35 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So just turn a blind eye to this kind of wealth disparity amongst people that are supposed to be representi g the populous until the numbers get bigger?

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

No? But maybe let's focus on the current issues, instead of someone who owns a business worth 30 million.

[–] theolodis@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

1 billion is 1,000 Millions, so to put it in perspective, she got 30, while Elon got richer by 300,000 Millions. I'd say focus on the problems by order of impact.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's all the same problem mate

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is why "by order of impact".

Penny wise, pound foolish is not a good system for addressing societal problems.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If it's the same problem it's the same solution. What do you mean by order of impact? The net worth of redistributing wealth held by decamillionaires far exceeds that held by billionaires. The biggest impact would indeed be to go after this group. Your argument is a very bourgeoisie finger pointing while sipping champagne type approach.

[–] ZDL@lazysoci.al 0 points 3 months ago

You can't possibly be this thick. You must be a troll.

I'm presuming the latter.

Buh-bye!