this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
106 points (92.7% liked)

Technology

78121 readers
1628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I'm fine with national space programs and whatnot.

Are you aware of just how much of NASA's budget was being drained for bullshit 'cost+' contracts with Boeing et al?

Elon sucks, but spacex has progressed space tech significantly, at a much lower cost than before.

National space programs are great, but the US turned them into a kickbacks program.

[–] Miaou@jlai.lu 0 points 1 hour ago

Indeed, as a state owned company, Boeing is really inefficient

[–] MrSmith@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

SpaceX is a garbage company that only proves my point. It's a leech of taxpayers' money for private gains.

NASA has achieved much more, much more time ago. If it wasn't for the brain-drain caused by SpaceX, and the cashflow that was directed away from it, it could've been much more useful.

Now all we get is the dickhead and his followers exploding rockets "to Mars" (lmao) for shits and giggles.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Looks like outsourcing good management of public resources to "greed" to fix inefficiencies. Why is some greedy fuck with delusions of grandeur needed here?

PS: ok, ok, you need an outsider asshole who is unafraid to go against installed parasites in the system to streamline processes...so...you end up with one giant parasite that interferes with elections and manipulates markets...:/

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like outsourcing good management of public resources to "greed" to fix inefficiencies.

Pretty much. The only upside is we're getting more return on less dollar from this particular instance of outsourcing. I'm well aware that's not always the case.

Why is some greedy fuck with delusions of grandeur needed here?

It's not, and it would be nice if the human race ever figures out a system for fair and equitable allocation of resources. But we haven't yet, so here we are stuck between corrupt politicians and greedy billionaires.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago

But there was a time when the system worked during the cold war, because it was tied to "national security" and the military. I just find it ironic that in a world that is so dependent on spatial products that interest seems to be taken so lightly when compared with the past.