this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
163 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1088 readers
696 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person, don't post hate.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe. Why not just send them a fucking submarine and do a few retrofits? Much easier to transport.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

Submarines are sealed units. You can't really retrofit them. If it doesn't fit through a hatch, you have to cut the hull, which can create a weakness when it's under pressure.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because a submarine is much more expensive than reactor parts? I dont think NK has 800million dollars to give russia. Plus, NK would love nothing more than boast about their own nuclear submarine.

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can afford new but not cold war hand-me-downs?

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Does russia have spare surplus? Pretty sure they scrapped everything thats not in active duty.