this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2025
69 points (92.6% liked)

Ask Science

14126 readers
16 users here now

Ask a science question, get a science answer.


Community Rules


Rule 1: Be respectful and inclusive.Treat others with respect, and maintain a positive atmosphere.


Rule 2: No harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or trolling.Avoid any form of harassment, hate speech, bigotry, or offensive behavior.


Rule 3: Engage in constructive discussions.Contribute to meaningful and constructive discussions that enhance scientific understanding.


Rule 4: No AI-generated answers.Strictly prohibit the use of AI-generated answers. Providing answers generated by AI systems is not allowed and may result in a ban.


Rule 5: Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.Adhere to community guidelines and comply with instructions given by moderators.


Rule 6: Use appropriate language and tone.Communicate using suitable language and maintain a professional and respectful tone.


Rule 7: Report violations.Report any violations of the community rules to the moderators for appropriate action.


Rule 8: Foster a continuous learning environment.Encourage a continuous learning environment where members can share knowledge and engage in scientific discussions.


Rule 9: Source required for answers.Provide credible sources for answers. Failure to include a source may result in the removal of the answer to ensure information reliability.


By adhering to these rules, we create a welcoming and informative environment where science-related questions receive accurate and credible answers. Thank you for your cooperation in making the Ask Science community a valuable resource for scientific knowledge.

We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've read in an Article that meat production causes a lot of co² emission. Now I was wondering if we stopped eating meat completely, would that be sufficient to get under the threshhold of emissions what the planet can process? What is that threshold? Where are we now? How much does meat add to this?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (21 children)

For the most part, not only does vegansim have the biggest positive impact on the environment that can be made with a personal choice, the animal products industries are like the third biggest contributor to climate change after energy (coal, oil, gas, etc) and manufacturing. Plus, as most farm land in the world is used for animal feed, it would free up land for reforestation.

P.s When talking about GHG emissions, it's a really bad idea to use % of total emissions as an indicator of impact. Livestock produce plenty of methane, which is roughly 84 times more impactful than carbon dioxide on the short term (20ish years) but carbon dioxide is more impactful over the long term (centuries) as it does not break down as quickly.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 3 days ago (12 children)

not only does vegansim have the biggest positive impact on the environment that can be made with a personal choice

there simply isn't any reliable data to support this claim.

[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago (11 children)

There is:

https://www.wri.org/insights/climate-impact-behavior-shifts

Other than going car free (not possible in many countries where roads are just not bikable or walkable) not flying (yeah, you probably shouldn't and personally I rarely ever do) and switching your home to green energy (again, not really possible in some countries plus high up fron costs keep it impossible for many) the biggest impact is achieved through veganism.

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I guess that makes sense even without needing a source

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)