this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
387 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

78121 readers
1832 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
L4s@hackingne.ws
387
Article: I switched to eSIM in 2025, and I am full of regret (arstechnica.com)
submitted 2 days ago by OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
143 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IdleSheep@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

But I don't need to do any of that either. My phone's settings have a transfer option for eSIMs and it passes the eSIM data to another phone.

No need to interact with the carrier app, no need to interact with the internet, no need to login to anything.

I guess activation times could be a thing but mine is always immediately active so I never noticed it.

So that leads me to my previously stated conclusion: eSIM isn't the issue, carrier implementation is.

I don't disagree with using physical either btw, I'm just saying in theory they're the same. In fact your carrier could just as easily lock down your physical SIM.